. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Is my question about the title absurd? If it is, how is it more absurd than to think that the literal eating of a particular fruit from a particular tree, even though forbidden by the Lord, can be considered so bad, so evil, that Adam and Eve must lose their chance for a continuation of physical life in paradise in The Garden and, with it, access to the Tree of Life and Eternal Life? If a child in our care did not follow our instructions for the first time, would we punish him with severe punishment on his first mistake? Obviously not, so why did the Lord punish our original parents so severely for eating the wrong kind of ‘apple’? OK, I know he doesn’t say apple, but he could say it too. So, does this seemingly trivial mistake and the punishment that follows it make any sense or, in other words, does the punishment correspond to the crime? One would have thought not, because if we go a step further and accept the biblical narrative as symbolic of something else, then it does make sense. In fact, we can safely assume that Adam and Eve’s sin was so grave, so heinous, that the Lord had no choice but to severely punish and banish our original parents from the Garden. This then leaves us with the question of what kind of wrongdoing or sin it could have been that would justify such severe punishment.

Until a while ago I thought that Adam and Eve’s sin was simply an act of bad judgment or wrong choice, but the writings I discovered recently have thrown a giant wrench into the works of my earlier understanding of their originality. sin. My understanding didn’t help much with what is written in the King James Bible either. However, always remember that as believers our understanding is never our own, it is the understanding given to us that matters and the Lord does not give us full understanding and knowledge all at once or at the beginning of our walk with Him. It takes years. of study and much waiting on Him. Having cleared up that little aside, let us write down the crucial verses here so that we can see for ourselves what the Holy Scriptures really say:

Genesis 3:15 And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between you seed Y his seed; she will bruise your head, and you will bruise her heel. (emphasis mine)

This verse is very important because it influences the whole of this study, since it mentions two seeds. Now, what are these two “seeds”, because before continuing we must be clear in our mind what they represent and, of course, it is very simple. Most readers will know what the Biblical word ‘seed’ means, in this context, but to be sure let’s use another example or two so there is no ambiguity or confusion:

Genesis 9:8-9 And God spoke to Noah and to his sons with him, saying: 9 And I, behold, I establish my covenant with you, and with your seed After you.

Genesis 15:3 And Abram said, Behold, you have not given me seed: and behold, one born in my house is my heir.

Strong’s Hebrew Ref: H2233 seed = zero gold zeh’-rah

from H2232; seed; figuratively Fruit, plant, rhythm hour, posterity:- X carnally, child, fruitful, seed (-time), sowing time.

So, as we can clearly see, the word ‘seed’ refers to offspring and if we refer to Strong’s Concordance for more evidence, we will find that the Hebrew word for ‘seed’ in Genesis 3:15 is the same as in Genesis 9: 9 and 15:3. Well, if we go back to Genesis 3:15 we can see that the Lord is going to put enmity between these two very different seeds or lines, but who is the Lord speaking to? Let’s go there now:

Genesis 3:14 And the LORD God said to the serpent, because you have done thisyou Art cursed among all beasts and among all animals of the field; on your belly you will walk, and dust you will eat all the days of your life.

There we have it; the Lord is speaking to the Devil, to Satan, that serpent and arch-deceiver also known as the destroyer, the adversary and in this case the arch-seducer, for, without a doubt, one of the two seeds mentioned here is his seed. Also note the phrase “because you did this”. From that we can easily deduce and know that Satan actually did something and the term ‘do something’, most of the time, refers to a physical action, not just an ‘action’ of sitting idly on the sidelines tempting, enticing or provoking. like an exuberant spectator.

So what does all this mean, because we are definitely dealing with a physical seed that belongs to the Devil? In turn, this now raises the question, how can a spiritual being have physical intercourse with a woman? Well, the only verse in Holy Scripture that we can trust or turn to for evidence of this event is in Genesis once again:

Genesis 6:1-2 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born to them, 2 who Children of God he saw the daughters of men were just; and they took for themselves wives of all that they thought.

who were these “Children of God” here who took the descendants or daughters of Adam for wives? Well, they can only be one thing, they were fallen angels or angels that went astray and left their first estate as described in Jude 6.

Jude 1:6 And the angels that kept up not his first statebut they left theirs living place, he has kept in life imprisonment under darkness until the judgment of the great day. (emphasis mine)

The important words in this verse are ‘not to keep’, ‘first state’, and ‘room’. The words ‘did not keep’ mean that they failed to keep a guard or failed to keep their inheritance or Spiritual status as precious, that is, to maintain some value on their Spiritual substance and the honor bestowed on them as Spiritual beings. Instead, they took it upon themselves to choose the lower order of the physical or the basic level of physical men. This means that they despised their heritage or first estate and gave more value to human carnal desires and, don’t forget, these daughters were women in the fallen condition, they were not saved. These angels treated with contempt their manifestly superior order with which the Lord had blessed them, that is, their ‘first estate’: their high position. Not only that, they also left their home or upper room; very reckless and foolish indeed. So much so that it ultimately cost them their freedom because the Lord imprisoned them in darkness, where they are to this day and where they will remain until the Last Great Day at the end of the Millennium or the end of the Lord’s thousand-year reign. on this earth as King of kings.

Now this brings us to an important issue. This evil was not unique, this had all happened before, and was a continuation of the previous evil of their leader, Satan the Devil, also known as sammael in the other writings I mentioned before. He set the example in The Garden and these fallen angels followed in his footsteps, and his actions were a repetition of his wickedness. So what was this evil? It was simply Eva’s seduction. Then we can add Adam’s infidelity or possibly even Adam’s sodomy; we do not know all the details. What we do know, however, is that the Devil contaminated his godly union, which had not been consummated until then. Adam and Eve discovered the sexual act through perversion and through lust and nothing but lust. This event was an aggravating event, because after the Devil had his wickedness with Eve, then, through Eve, he encouraged Adam to take her afterwards (he also ate of the fruit), thus reducing her to the status of a sexual object, a adulteress or possibly worse, a promiscuous whore or unpaid whore. This, in effect, was the first pornographic act, the first threesome; the use of a woman’s body for nothing more than selfish sexual gratification. There was no love in this event, and it was the first sexual act on earth between a man and a woman, but only after being exhibited by another. So they also knew that they were naked and covered themselves with leaves and why they also hid from the Lord in The Garden. They covered their sexual regions, they were burdened with shame and guilt, they felt dirty and polluted. Also, it was this act that gave them the knowledge of good and evil, not through literally eating an ‘apple’, the fruit is pure symbolism. Not only that, if we think that literally eating the fruit from the wrong tree can make us feel dirty, unclean and shameful, what kind of fruit could that be? Well, we could and would feel guilty for not following the Lord’s instructions, but not dirty and ashamed. No, there is only one act that could have had that kind of effect on a previously innocent man and woman and that act is the promiscuous, lustful, loveless, perverted sexual act.

Ok, so now we have the evidence showing that this wicked event took place, but where does this lead us? Let’s just go back to the two seeds, the two seeds that produced two descendants: Cain and Abel. One son was of the seed of the Devil and the other was of the seed of Adam. How do we know this? It’s not easy, because the King James Bible is not that useful, so we have to look elsewhere, but where? Well, before we do that, let’s copy the verse from the KJV here, first, to analyze what it says:

Gen 4:1-2 And Adam knew Eve his wife; and she conceived, and she bare Cain, and said, I have gotten a man from the Lord. 2 And she again gave birth to her brother Abel. And Abel was a shepherd, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.

Now, based on the evidence I have revealed from the Holy Scriptures, Genesis 4:1 seems to read as a complete contradiction of the previous verses. We know there will be two seeds, but this verse sounds as if it is saying that Cain is the son of Adam and Abel is also the son of Adam, and not only that, but Cain was a gift to Eve from the Lord himself, no less. Now where have the two seeds gone, because if Cain and Abel are both sons of Adam, then they can only be of one seed, because they are both of Adam’s seed, so what is going on in this verse? Well, we know, don’t we, the true evidence has been removed from the narrative by the translators. Now there’s a surprise, and why would they do that!? They would do so because it would mean they would have to admit that there are certain beings we live with on this earth who are of a specific demon race. It would also mean that they would have to admit what I have said above, that Eve had intercourse with the Devil and produced this race through Cain from that evil and illegitimate union. The question is, who are these beings and how do we identify them? Well, first of all, we need to understand a lot of things that happen here in Genesis 4:1 that will require another article to cover, so get on with it folks.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *